rotator Powder Coating Sunday, December 21, 2014
Skip Navigation LinksHome) Item Details
Powder Coating is the only technical publication devoted to the Powder Coating industry and other green finishing technologies.
General Articles
   
Item Details:
Publication Date: 09/2003
Pages: 4
Medium:
PDF Format
US:
$7.50
Related Item(s):
Author(s):
Recommended Item:
Taking its lumps: How classification codes and insurance companies paint powder coating into a corner

What do enameling, lacquering, varnishing, and hot-dip galvanizing have in common with powder coating? Apart from being finishing methods, not much. Powder coating is by far a much safer, more environmentally sound way of treating a product. Yet industry classification codes and insurance companies lump powder coating companies in with other finishing methods that are more hazardous and risky to operate, which results in high premiums for general liability insurance. This article offers opinions from various people in the powder coating industry who would like to see a change, but in the meantime, are trying to make the most of the situation.

Mike and April Gorski have a story to tell with words that may be as familiar to other powder coaters as the lyrics to a Top 40 song. The husbandand-wife team started Carolina FabCoat, a powder coating job shop in Roebuck, S. C., in April 2002. When they spoke with an insurance agent about general liability insurance, their agent told them an underwriter would have to assess their risk in the same classification code as the one used for electroplaters. "My husband said, 'That's not right, we don't deal with any hazardous materials,'" April Gorski said. Mike Gorski sent the insurance agent some general information about the powder coating process in hopes the agency would make the differentiation between powder coating and electroplating, but the company wouldn't budge. "We were told the insurance industry just didn't have a classification for powder coating," April Gorski said. They renewed their policy with the same agent in March, but they're not happy to be classified as electroplaters. "I'm sure the premiums are much higher than what we need to pay," she said.

To read this entire article:

You may purchase this article now for personal use. Simply click the Buy Item button above, enter your payment details, and download the article. It will be available to you for 7 days for viewing, printing, or saving for future reference. All articles are copyrighted by CSC Publishing, Inc. and cannot be used for commercial purposes without express permission in writing from the Publisher. This includes but is not limited to: web posting, printing, or sharing via email.

Security:

Your payment information is forwarded in an encrypted form, using 40- or 128-bit Secure Socket Layer technology, only to our payment gateway (Authorize.net) for processing.

Acrobat:

To view an article, you must have Acrobat Reader installed on your computer. Click on the icon to download Acrobat Reader free of charge.

HyperLink
      Copyright 2014, CSC Publishing Inc. ALL Rights Reserved * Privacy policy